ETH Supply Hub

Why do ETH supply numbers differ across sites?

Look up "ETH supply" on three sites and you will get three different numbers. None of them is necessarily wrong — they measure different things, at different times, with different definitions. This page puts the numbers side by side and explains each gap.

Live comparison — all values measured in the same collection run, 2026-07-27T05:33:55Z (UTC)

Burn rate: direct measurement vs ultrasound.money

SourceBurn (ETH / 24h)How it is measured
This site (direct) 29.5 Sum of base-fee and blob burn over 7,200 raw block headers
ultrasound.money d1 29.5 Their indexer's rolling 24h burn sum

These two should agree within a few percent — the residual gap is window boundaries (our window ends at our head block, theirs at their indexer head). A persistent large gap would indicate a methodology bug on one side; that is exactly what this cross-check exists to catch.

Supply: consensus-derived vs CoinGecko circulating

SourceETH supplyDefinition
Consensus-derived total (ultrasound.money supply-parts) 121,884,168 execution balances + beacon balances − processed deposits
CoinGecko circulating 120,682,636 Aggregator's circulating-supply estimate

Current gap: 1,201,532 ETH (0.99% of supply).

The three real reasons numbers differ

1. "Circulating" is not "total"

Total supply counts every ETH in existence. Circulating supply subtracts what an aggregator considers non-circulating — and for ETH there is no official foundation-locked allocation schedule like many tokens have, so each aggregator applies its own judgement. That judgement is the gap.

2. Update lag

ETH supply changes every block (issuance up, burn down). A number cached hours ago is already off by the net issuance accrued since. Sites refresh at different cadences; this site stamps every figure with its measurement time so lag is visible instead of hidden.

3. Methodology

Some sites read the execution layer only, some include beacon-chain balances, some track the deposit contract (which only ever grows and therefore overstates stake after withdrawals). Two honest measurements with different system boundaries produce different numbers.

Rule of thumb: for "is ETH inflationary" questions use a consensus-derived total measured at a stated time (what the dashboard shows). For market-cap comparisons across coins, aggregators' circulating figures are the convention — just don't mix the two.